MAOS
Multithreaded Adaptive Optics Simulator

The following table and figure show comparison of turbulence profile at 25, 50, and 75 percentile seeing
Percentile  Mauna Kea r0 (m)  ORM r0 (m) 

25p  0.247  0.230 
50p  0.186  0.178 
75p  0.135  0.138 
Turbulence Profile 

The following lists AO system and instrument parameters and the respective AO performance.
MAOS simulations obtained estimation of the fundamental terms. Implementation error of 153 nm (34x34” FoV) and 152 nm (On axis) is added in quadrature to get the estimate of the total WFE.
The following figures show the RMS WFE averaged over 34"x34" field of view or on axis.
Wavefront error  

The following figures show the J band Strehl Ratio averaged over 34"x34" field of view or on axis.
J band Strehl  

The following figures show the H band Strehl Ratio averaged over 34"x34" field of view or on axis.
H band Strehl  

The following figures show the K band Strehl Ratio averaged over 34"x34" field of view or on axis.
K band Strehl  

MAOS simulations obtained estimation of the fundamental terms. Implementation error of 130 nm is added in quadrature to get the estimate of the total WFE.
The following figures show the wavefront error and Strehl Ratio for median seeing for the on axis field.
Wavefront error  Strehl Ratio 

NFIRAOS+ is upgraded NFIRAOS with 0.25m actuator spacing. The following figure shows the comparison of NFIRAOS and NFIRAOS+ fundamental WFE (without implementation error) for different LGS magnitude or detector read out noise. The following conditions are used:
Wavefront erroor o 
